Participants Guideline

ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPANT RULES


To ensure a fair and inclusive competition, the following criteria and requirements must be met by all participants:


  1. Eligibility

      1.1. Educational Levels:

        1.1.1 Open to students from the following levels:

          1.1.1.1. Elementary School (Grade 4–6)
          1.1.1.2. Middle School (Grade 7–9))
          1.1.1.3. High School (Grade 10–12)
          1.1.1.4. Undergraduate (Bachelor's Degree, any discipline)


      1.2. Age Restriction:
      Participants must be aged 10 to 24 years as of the registration deadline.

      1.3. Team Composition:

        1.3.1. Participants may compete individually or in teams of up to 5 members.
        1.3.2. eams can include members from different schools/universities or countries but must register under one institution.
        1.3.3. Participants are only allowed to register as part of one team and cannot participate in multiple teams or as an individual in addition to a team.


      1.4 Supervision Requirement:
      All participants, regardless of age or educational level, are required to have a mentor (teacher, academic advisor, or professional supervisor).

  2. General Rules

      2.1. Project Submission : Each individual or team is allowed to submit only one project.
      2.2. Originality: All projects must be the original work of the participants. Plagiarism will result in disqualification
      2.3. Research Areas: Projects must align with one of the three categories:

        2.3.1. Natural and humanity science
        2.3.2. Applied technology
        2.3.3. Technical and engineering

      2.4. International Participation: The competition is open to participants from all countries.

  3. Registration Requirements

      3.1. Documents to Submit:

        3.1.1. Completed registration form.
        3.1.2. Abstract of the project (PDF format).
        3.1.3. Confirmation letter after the registration form

      3.2. Language: All submitted materials must be in English.
      3.3. Deadlines: All documents and fees (if applicable) must be submitted before the registration deadline. Late submissions will not be accepted.

  4. Code of Conduct

      4.1. Participants must maintain a spirit of sportsmanship and professionalism throughout the competition.
      4.2. Any form of misconduct, including cheating or disruptive behaviour, may result in disqualification.


JUDGING CRITERIA


  1. Originality

    Originality assesses the uniqueness and innovation of the project. This criterion evaluates the extent to which the participant has introduced new ideas, perspectives, or approaches in addressing the scientific, technological, or engineering challenge. Judges will consider how the project stands out from existing works and whether it brings a fresh and creative contribution to the field.

  2. Research Methodology

    Research Methodology evaluates the scientific rigor and approach taken in conducting the project. This criterion considers the clarity of the research question, the appropriateness of the research design, the accuracy of data collection methods, and the robustness of data analysis. Judges will assess how well the participant demonstrates a systematic and well-structured research process.

  3. Oral Presentation

    Oral Presentation evaluates the participant's ability to communicate effectively and engage the audience. This criterion considers clarity, organization, and delivery of the presentation. Judges will assess the participant's verbal communication skills, the ability to convey complex ideas in a clear and accessible manner, and the overall impact of the presentation on the audience.

  4. Poster Design

    Poster Design assesses the visual representation of the project. This criterion considers the clarity and attractiveness of the poster layout, the use of graphics and visuals, and the overall design aesthetic. Judges will evaluate how well the poster captures the essence of the project, making it visually appealing and easy to understand for the audience.

  5. Future Research Prospect

    Future Research Prospect evaluates the participant's ability to articulate potential future directions for their work. This criterion considers the participant's understanding of the broader implications of their project and the identification of areas for further exploration. Judges will assess the feasibility, relevance, and significance of the proposed future research directions. This criterion encourages participants to think critically about the long-term impact of their work.


GUIDELINES FOR ABSTRACT


  1. Abstract should not exceed one A4 page and font size Times New Roman
  2. Abstract should be between 150 and 300 words
  3. Abstract should be written as only one paragraph
  4. Abstract should include:
    • Project Title
    • Participant’s Name
    • Institution/ Organization / School / Country
    • Email
    • Introduction / Summary of the project
    • Conclusion
    • Keywords
  5. Abstract should be in PDF format.

POSTER GUIDELINES


  1. Maximum poster size is A1 or according to booth size (1m x 1m with only two walls).


  2. Carrying X-Banner is prohibited.
  3. Installing posters on booth walls is only permitted using paper tape or masking tape (Painter’s tape).
  4. Do not use double-sided tape, nails or anything that could cause damage to the booth walls.