To ensure a fair and inclusive competition, the following criteria and requirements must be met by all participants:
1.1. Educational Levels:
1.1.1 Open to students from the following levels:
1.1.1.1. Elementary School (Grade 4–6)
1.1.1.2. Middle School (Grade 7–9))
1.1.1.3. High School (Grade 10–12)
1.1.1.4. Undergraduate (Bachelor's Degree, any discipline)
1.3.1. Participants may compete individually or in teams of up to 5 members.
1.3.2. eams can include members from different schools/universities or countries but must register under one institution.
1.3.3. Participants are only allowed to register as part of one team and cannot participate in multiple teams or as an individual in addition to a team.
2.1. Project Submission : Each individual or team is allowed to submit only one project.
2.2. Originality: All projects must be the original work of the participants. Plagiarism will result in disqualification
2.3. Research Areas: Projects must align with one of the three categories:
2.3.1. Natural and humanity science
2.3.2. Applied technology
2.3.3. Technical and engineering
3.1. Documents to Submit:
3.1.1. Completed registration form.
3.1.2. Abstract of the project (PDF format).
3.1.3. Confirmation letter after the registration form
4.1. Participants must maintain a spirit of sportsmanship and professionalism throughout the competition.
4.2. Any form of misconduct, including cheating or disruptive behaviour, may result in disqualification.
Originality assesses the uniqueness and innovation of the project. This criterion evaluates the extent to which the participant has introduced new ideas, perspectives, or approaches in addressing the scientific, technological, or engineering challenge. Judges will consider how the project stands out from existing works and whether it brings a fresh and creative contribution to the field.
Research Methodology evaluates the scientific rigor and approach taken in conducting the project. This criterion considers the clarity of the research question, the appropriateness of the research design, the accuracy of data collection methods, and the robustness of data analysis. Judges will assess how well the participant demonstrates a systematic and well-structured research process.
Oral Presentation evaluates the participant's ability to communicate effectively and engage the audience. This criterion considers clarity, organization, and delivery of the presentation. Judges will assess the participant's verbal communication skills, the ability to convey complex ideas in a clear and accessible manner, and the overall impact of the presentation on the audience.
Poster Design assesses the visual representation of the project. This criterion considers the clarity and attractiveness of the poster layout, the use of graphics and visuals, and the overall design aesthetic. Judges will evaluate how well the poster captures the essence of the project, making it visually appealing and easy to understand for the audience.
Future Research Prospect evaluates the participant's ability to articulate potential future directions for their work. This criterion considers the participant's understanding of the broader implications of their project and the identification of areas for further exploration. Judges will assess the feasibility, relevance, and significance of the proposed future research directions. This criterion encourages participants to think critically about the long-term impact of their work.